The Specialist #11: American Vengeance, by John Cutter
November, 1985 Signet Books
Boy, I forgot all about The Specialist, didn’t I? The first volume was one of the first reviews I posted on this blog, back in the summer of 2010; I bought the entire series from a single seller back then, and at the time I had no idea it would take me sixteen years to read all eleven books.
It’s been over six years since I read the previous volume, and unfortunately American Vengeance serves as a direct sequel. I’d pretty much forgotten the entire story, but John Shirley (aka “John Cutter”) does a good job of catching up readers who missed the previous book – or, like me, who just plain forgot it. Long story short, Jack “The Specialist” Sullivan is all fired up to take down Hassan the Red, an Iranian terrorist who was responsible for every Iranian attack on American citizens.
Yes, this was a timely read. But in a way it was a refreshing reminder of how once upon a time America understood that the terrorist-supporting regime of Iran was evil, something our leadership has forgotten in the ensuing decades...with such notable “progress” as sending Iran billions of dollars and even helpfully putting them on the path to attaining nuclear arms. Gee, what could go wrong?
Indeed, author Shirley dedicates American Vengeance to “the resistance fighting for freedom in Iran.” One wonders if he still supports the Iranian resistance, or if TDS has rotted away his brain (as it has for so, so many others). Some years ago I attempted to read Shirley’s Eclipse trilogy from the ‘80s – I dutifully picked up the original paperback printings many years ago – and as I was reading it I happened to come across a recent interview with Shirley (I think this was around 2019 or so). Eclipse is about characters in a cyberpunk future fighting a fascist government, and folks if you think Shirley in the 2019 interview compared his fictional future fascist government to the Trump administration, you win a no-prize. He even did the old leftist trick of comparing populism with fascism, when the two are altogether different (but then people today conveniently forget that the Nazis themselves were socialists…“Socialist” was even in their damn name!!).
Does the Iranian resistance get any love today? We get stories and stories about the people suffering in Ukraine, even the friggin’ king of England proclaiming we must defend Ukraine to the US Congress(?!!), and yet not a peep about the countless thousands who have been butchered in Iran. It’s curious, isn’t it. Back in the late ‘90s I dated a girl from Iran, and for several years her dad had been a prisoner of the regime, kept in a cell and beaten. Somehow he’d managed to get free and immigrated to the US with the rest of his family. What was most curious was how blasé they were about it: “That’s my dad. He was a prisoner in Iran for a couple years. Hey, you wanna watch The Nanny?” But anyway even then, as a non-political idiot in my 20s, I wondered why the US still hadn’t taken that goddamn tyrannical regime down.
Anyway I digress. It just makes me sad when smart people say stupid things, and Shirley’s TDS comments were enough to make me drop reading the Eclipse books. (Plus I found the first volume ponderous and lacking any of the spark Shirley brought to the men’s adventure novels he was writing at the time, so there’s that.) But this political digression has a point: there was a time when the despotic government of Iran was seen for what it was. It’s unfortunate it has taken so many years – and so many presidents – to finally address the situation. And I’m curious if the people who felt so strongly about stopping Iran back in the ‘80s have become so brainwashed by their own leftist bullshit that they no longer feel that way today. I mean, it’s not like the Iranian regime has become a kinder and gentler government, is it? How many protesters did they butcher last year alone? Then again, we live in a country where losers can stand beside a Starbucks with a “No Kings” sign for a couple hours and declare themselves heroes of democracy, so clearly we’ve lost all sense of what heroic struggle actually means.
So since nothing was being done then, Shirley has his hero Jack Sullivan taking on the brunt of “American vengeance,” squaring things away with an almost mythical Iranian terrorist leader called Hassan the Red. Sullivan’s been chasing the bastard since the previous volume, and as American Vengeance opens he’s busting into the hotel room of a pair of Hassan’s followers, a scene artist Mel Crair depicts on the cover.
Hassan’s army is called the Warriors of Islam, and a lot of them are in France; the majority of the novel plays out in Paris. It seems to be not too long after the previous volume – merc Merlin is still in the hospital, we’re told – yet it’s long enough that a little time seems to have passed. Sullivan’s colleagues this time are a group of Israeli Mossad agents (yet more timely material! One wonders if you’d encounter heroic characters from Israel in today’s woke publishing landscape…).
I wonder if Shirley knew this would be the final volume. There isn’t much indication he did, other than a random part where Sullivan calls Bonnie, his hotstuff girlfriend back in the States…and tells her he loves her. This is usually a bad sign for things, either for the series overall or just for that particular character. Also, we are informed the two have “unofficially adopted” the little orphan girl Sullivan saved a few volumes ago. One wonders if, had there been another volume of The Specialist, either of these characters would have encountered a rough time.
Humorously, just a few pages after telling Bonnie he loves her, Sullivan is having somewhat-explicit sex with a beautiful Israeli secret agent named Sabra. While reserved when compared to the overdone sex scenes of earlier volumes, it still has such humorous lines as, “Sullivan slowly lowered her onto his prong.” Which of course made me think of the metal band.
The problem with American Vengeance is that it lacks the pulpy fun of earlier volumes; this one is a standard “terrorist of the week” yarn, similar to innumerable other Gold Eagle publications of the day. In fact I wonder if Shirley wasn’t given orders from the publisher to cut back on the weird stuff and do what Gold Eagle was doing.
Thus, a lot of the book is repetitive; Sullivan will track down Hassan in Paris and just miss him, lending everything the unintentional (or not) vibe of a Looney Tunes cartoon. It happens over and over in American Vengeance, with the wily terrorist bastard setting bombs in the places he was staying, resulting in several innocent bystanders getting killed. And each scene caps off with Sullivan becoming even angrier and more determined to kill Hassan.
The climax takes place in Iran, where Hassan has managed to get a nuclear bomb. Again working with Mossad, Sullivan is able to slip into Hassan’s base and prevent nuclear Armageddon, and the bomb actually goes off, but humorously Shirley quickly retcons everything that “it wasn’t a big bomb” and thus the damage is only relegated to Hassan’s patch of Iran – in other words, the poetic justice of the terrorist blowing up his own country. But again, American Vengeance was written in the days before Muslim terrorists strapped bombs to their own children, so the finale doesn’t have the impact today that it likely did then.
The last we see of Jack Sullivan, he’s on an airplane, looking down at the nuclear blast, affirming to himself that America has been avenged. And this is the last we’ll ever see of him, as no future volumes of The Specialist were forthcoming. The book does not promote itself as the final volume, so I’ll wager that low sells quietly killed the series; the question is whether Shirley wrote any further volumes that went unpublished.
Overall The Specialist was mostly entertaining, particularly the middle of the run, when Shirley had fun with various crazy things like Sullivan achieving “Hulk power” or fighting Satanic subway mutants. But as the series progressed it appears that he was asked to write more “standard” fare, and the series suffered as a result, coming off like too many of its contemporaries.

8 comments:
Since you made this review political, I guess I'll respond in kind. Israel violates international law, assassinates leaders and starts wars at will, and they actually does possess nukes. Meanwhile Iran, who Netanyahu has been telling us is weeks away from getting nukes for more than 30 years, has tried to negotiate many times, and what do they get? Their leaders assassinated and their country bombed in sneak attacks by Trump and Israel. Especially after the genocidal treatment of Gaza and the repeated unprovoked attacks on Iran, not many people are buying your simple story of good guys vs terrorists any more (a simple civilian body count will tell you which side is behaving more like terrorists). It's mostly hardcore tribalists, end-timers and ignoramuses mainlining Fox News who still believe that BS. Which one are you?
My favorite aspect of this series is the cover art by Mel Crair. He was one of the greats.
"Israel violates international law,"
Citation needed
"assassinates leaders"
Who generally deserve it
"starts wars at will,
Citation needed
"and they actually does possess nukes."
Which they haven't used despite having them for decades.
"Meanwhile Iran...has tried to negotiate many times,"
Always in bad faith and while funding actual terrorists,
"Their leaders assassinated and their country bombed in sneak attacks by Trump and Israel."
Yes, because as we all know it is a requirement that one must announce that you are going to attack X place at Y time on Z date in order to make things sporting.
Thanks for the comments, everyone! Shadow, I see your point of course, but man...Iran bombing all of its neighbors after being attacked by the US is pretty much all the sign we need of how trustworthy they are. And also there's the little fact of them screaming "Death to America" for nearly 50 years; there comes a time when you should believe what someone repeatedly says.
Another fun fact I find very interesting is that reportedly only around 30% of the Iranian population is Muslim (the girl I dated way back when was not Muslim, btw), yet they are ruled by a hardcore Islamic regime that punishes and kills with impunity. And Israel isn't perfect, but personally I'm going to support the side that DIDN'T paraglide into a country and butcher a bunch of innocents at a music festival, kidnapping many and using them as sex slaves. Once upon a time a group like that would be thought of as the bad guys!
But mainly I went into this political detour because "American Vengeance" is itself pretty political -- Shirley makes it clear that the Islamic regime is evil (its attacks on American citizens being frequently mentioned), and there's no "gray zone" with the Israeli Mossad agents; they're the good guys with Sullivan, fighting the evil Muslim terrorists. And it's also made clear that toppling the Muslim regime would be a good thing not only for Iran but for the world; there's even an Iranian character I failed to mention in my review who is known as "the Abraham Lincoln of Iran" and who wants to become the secular leader of the country after the regime is deposed...sort of like the real-world son of the Shah today.
What I found most interesting from a 2026 perspective is my certainty that the author has done a complete 180 on all of this in the ensuing decades, because Trump.
Trashy 80s fiction isn't the best place to get informed about geopolitics. Neither is American media, particularly when it involves Israel and Iran. It's tough to break through a lifetime of propaganda, but it's possible (I'm proof of that; I used to have similar positions as you guys but changed my mind after getting more informed).
As for Tom’s “citations needed”. See Gaza. Netanyahu was convicted in international court and it was declared a genocide. As for "leaders who generally deserve it" Says who? Every fascist regime says that about people it kills; most of the world disagrees. As for starting wars, see Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, etc. Israel doesn't get a special card that allows it to commit acts of war with impunity. As for Iran funding terrorists, again, that's what fascist regimes always call their enemies. But according to Iran (and much of the world), Hezbollah is legitimate resistance to Israeli colonialism and imperialism in Lebanon.
The point about negotiations is Israel and Trump don't act in good faith and can't be negotiated with; they'd rather just drop bombs while pretending to negotiate. That makes them international pariahs and criminals in most people's books. If you think that's clever, maybe you need to look in the mirror and ask if you're the baddie.
That was a lot of words to say "Hello, my name is Tucker Carlson."
Sorry, I'm capable of making judgments based on the information given to me rather than blindly taking someone else's word for things, and if Israel were actually trying to commit genocide in Gaza there'd be a lot more dead Palestinians.
The rest of your comment is similarly divorced from reality.
75,000 Palestinians killed since October 7 versus about 2,500 Israeli. Is that enough?
To call it a genocide? Considering that there were around 2.2 million Palestinians living in Gaza and it's been two and a half years since October 7, 2023, if the Israelis are engaging in genocide they are extremely bad at it.
Post a Comment